beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. The reasons why the court should explain this case are as follows. (1) The annexed calculation table of damages in the court of first instance is replaced as follows. (2) One of the reasons why the court of first instance rendered the judgment is as follows.
subsection (Limitation of liability) shall be as follows 2.1
(3) under paragraph (4) below the third and the second "application of the vocational coefficient of ordinary workers" shall be as follows 2.B.
(4) above the 9th half and the 10th half of the decision of the court of first instance are as follows 2.C.
(5) On the 5th of the first instance judgment, the part of the daily income calculation table of the second to the sixthth of the second to the next 2. D.
(6) On the 7th day of the first instance judgment, the respective "date of the closing of pleadings" as set forth in the 7th day of the first instance judgment shall be used as follows: (6) on the date of the closing of pleadings in the court of first instance; (13) on May 13, 2016, "B" ; (7) on the 7th day of the first instance judgment as set forth in the 7th half to the upper part (d) of the 8th day (d) of the 2th day of the second instance judgment; (8) on the 7th day of the first instance judgment, the portion shall be written as set forth in the 2th E; and (9) on the 2th day of the first instance judgment as set forth in the 20th day of the 11th to the 9th day following the 8th day of the first instance judgment; and (9) on the 4th day of the second instance judgment as set forth in the 20th day of the 1st instance judgment as follows.
2. Parts to be dried;
A. The limitation of liability: (a) the Plaintiff, while driving the Oral Ba, committed an error of collision with the said rocketing vehicle while holding the right-hand turn signal at the intersection in violation of the signal; and (b) the Plaintiff was wearing a safety cap, but the Plaintiff seems to have been out of the safety cap due to the shock of the accident, and thus the damage was increased; (c) the background and circumstances of the instant accident, before, and after the accident, the Plaintiff.