logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2016. 09. 07. 선고 2015누11241 판결
이 사건 토지는 합병후 분할하여 양도하는 경우로 양도자산의 필지별 구분이 가능하므로 그 취득시기는 지분별로 안분하는 것이 아님[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Cheongju District Court-2015-Gu Partnership-320 ( October 08, 2015)

Title

The land in this case can be divided by lots of transferred assets in the case of transfer by division after the merger, so the time of acquisition is not divided by shares.

Summary

(The same as the judgment of the first instance court) If a parcel of land is transferred in installments after the consolidation, the case of dividing the acquisition time by share falls under a case where the classification is unclear, and it is impossible to recognize that the provision of reduction or exemption is expanded even in the case where the classification is obvious by the cadastral map.

Cases

Daejeon High Court (ju) 2015Nu11241 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax;

Plaintiff and appellant

00

Defendant, Appellant

00. Head of tax office

Judgment of the first instance court

Cheongju District Court Decision 2015Guhap320 decided October 08, 2015

Conclusion of Pleadings

2016.07.20

Imposition of Judgment

2016.09.07

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The defendant's disposition of imposition of KRW 000 on July 9, 2014 against the plaintiff on July 9, 2014 is revoked.

Reasons

The reasoning of the court's reasoning on this case is as follows: "The transfer of land to be transferred to a neighboring non-self-owned land to meet the requirements for reduction and exemption of capital gains tax under the Act on Special Cases concerning Taxation" in Articles 5 and 18-20 of the judgment of the court of first instance does not transfer the part meeting the requirements for reduction and exemption under the Act on Special Cases concerning Taxation for at least eight years from among the land of one parcel, the location and area of which the acquisition time differs, and the part meeting the requirements for reduction and exemption under the Act on Special Cases concerning Taxation is not transferred, but rather, the part meeting the requirements for reduction and exemption under the Act on Special Cases concerning Taxation is the same as the entry in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case where the part belonging to the scope to which the heavy taxation provisions apply

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow