logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2016. 09. 07. 선고 2015누11067 판결
양도가액이 불분명하여 기준시가를 적용한 것이 적법한지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Cheongju District Court-2014-Gu Partnership-651 (20 August 20, 2015)

Title

Whether it is legitimate to apply the standard market price due to unclear transfer value.

Summary

(The actual transaction price of land is the same as the judgment of the court of first instance) where it is impossible to divide the actual transaction price of land into a lump sum transaction, the calculation of each transfer price based on the objective value of each land according to the appraiser's appraisal result and correction and notification of transfer income tax is legitimate

Related statutes

Article 96 of the Income Tax Act

Article 100 of the Income Tax Act (Calculation of Gains on Transfer)

Cases

Daejeon High Court (Cheongju)-2015-Nu 11067 (2016.07)

Plaintiff

Cheongju District Court-2014-Gu Partnership-651 ( April 20, 2015)

Defendant

Head of Chungcheong Tax Office

Conclusion of Pleadings

June 15, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

September 7, 2016

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The Defendant’s transfer income tax of KRW 9,135,302 against the Plaintiff on May 1, 2013

(2) The disposition of imposition shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The court's reasoning for this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation

Article 8 (2) of the Court Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be quoted as it is.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so ordered as per Disposition.

corporation.

arrow