logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.04.28 2015고단3413
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the defendants, two years from the date of this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 1, 2015, the Defendants violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) committed a dispute with the victim on the ground that the victim F (23 Dose) who is an employee of the above restaurant (23 Dose) responded to the demand of the Defendant A while drinking alcohol in the “E cafeteria” located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City around 19:50 on July 1, 2015, the Defendants were able to see the victim’s her hand, her hand her the victim’s neck, her chest the victim’s chest her chest her chest her chest, and her hand her the victim’s face was her hand over once with the said cafeteria’s finger her hand.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

2. The Defendants were required to accompany to the earth in order to hear detailed developments from the slope Ginjin Police Station affiliated with the Seoul Minejin Police Station, which called out after receiving 112 reports that the assault case occurred at the time and place described in paragraph 1.

Defendant A, “A”, “A, bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch,” and “A, while doing so, tried to leave the site while doing so, was pushed off the part of the above G as a hand, which attempted to restrain it. Defendant B, following A, leaving the restaurant outside the restaurant, was unable to put the son by hand of G due to defective hand, and Defendant A continued to do so outside the above restaurant.”

n. “A bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch G’s chest at hand, and Defendant B committed assault by preventing the Defendant from arresting him as a current offender, and by cutting his arms in his hand.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. The witness G and F’s respective legal statements, and the witness H’s partial statement in court;

1. The Defendants and H part of each police suspect interrogation protocol.

arrow