beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On August 10, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to 4 years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court on September 23, 2011, and was sentenced to 3 years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Northern District Court on September 23, 201 and completed on January 1, 2015, the previous department was nine times more.
【Criminal Facts】
1. At around 12:00 on March 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed theft against the victim C, at the first floor restaurant of the students’ hall of a school located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul (134); and (b) by using a cresh in order to get corrosion, the victim C used a cresh in the instant restaurant in which the victim was placed on his/her own part of the said restaurant, with one room in the market value equivalent to KRW 2.50,00,000, the market value of the victim, which was located on the part of the said restaurant.
2. At around 18:00 on March 17, 2015, the Defendant thefted the victim D and E with one cellular phone in so far as the victim E, who was placed in a scam in a scamball by using the scam scambling scam in order for the victim D and the victim E to provide a axis, one cell phone in so far as the market value of the victim E, which is the victim E, was 1,000,000 won, and one cell phone in the city and one gallon in the city and the gallon gallon in the city and the city.
3. At around 12:48 March 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed theft against the Victim F, at a restaurant at the Seoul University Students’ Center located in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu; and (b) at the victim F, at the victim’s school located in a cafeteria to teach a restaurant, the victim F, using the cresh of the cresh, thereby cutting off the victim’s market value equivalent to KRW 70,000,000,000,000,000 won.
Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victim's property.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each statement of F, G, C, D, and E;
1. Records of seizure;