logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.11.06 2013고단2209
공무집행방해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 1, 2013, at around 19:27, the Defendant: (a) 4 police officers, such as slope H, etc., dispatched to the scene after receiving a report that he fights on the “E” restaurant located in Jindo-si, Jindo-si, Jindo-si; (b) the Defendant sent a fighting boat to the site; and (c) the Defendant made an intimidation to F police officers, such as slope H and Mindo-affiliated affiliated with the F police station G police box called “I sway, sweet, sweet, and sweet. I live in the prosecutor’s office; (d) the Defendant made a threat to the police officers sweet, “I sweet the sweet.” while taking the bath to the sweet, sweet the sweet, and subsequently obstructed the police officers’ legitimate performance of their duties, such as assaulting and selling the sweet slope of H.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the same time, at the same place as above 1.3, and at the same place, Defendant B threatened the said A with a defective slope H to arrest the said A as a flagrant offender committing the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and obstructed a police officer’s lawful performance of duties regarding the arrest of a flagrant offender, such as threatening to flasing, “I Chewing, I am flasing our kind of flag, why I flas, I am flag, and flading the flag’s flab by flading the fla

3. Defendant C arrested the above A and B as a flagrant offender for the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties, at the same time, at the same place as the above 1.3 time, place, and slopeH as indicated in the above 1.3, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties in relation to the arrest of flagrant offender by threatening H and policeman I, “I expressed my desire to do so,” and 112 patrol vehicles favorable to drinking cars.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police officer's statement of the I police officer with regard to the Assistant H or police officer;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Article 334 of the Criminal Procedure Act provides for the provisional payment order.

arrow