Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for ten months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:00 on April 5, 2015, the Defendants were sent to the E-sing room in the influence of alcohol at the E-sing room in Kimhae-si, on the 112 report by the 112-party 1, and was called out, the Defendants came to be subject to a removal from J, Assistant K, L, L, and L, and M.

Accordingly, Defendant A, in the course of walking the bridge of Haman on one occasion, knife the cap of the above L, cut the string, cut the string on the main floor, cut the water, cut the water from the slope K, cut the water from the slope K without any reason, walking the above K’s left side side and the left side buckbucks, cut off the H’s buck, booming the Habbbbbbbbs, booming the h’s body, booming the body of the patrolman, and booming the above M with the wall, so that the above M’s right knick knife knife would face with the wall.

On the other hand, Defendant B expressed that “I am feat, internal feat, and feat,” Defendant B feated L to “I am feat. I am feat. I am feat. I am feat. I ambling L’s body to restrain the above L, and ambling the body of L which prevents the Defendant’s arrest of the Defendant as a flagrant offender for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and walked twice through the slope G ambuck and bucks where I ambuck in order to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender for the crime of obstruction of official duties. In order to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender, I am feat of G’s right part of the chest to the right part of the Defendant’s chest to the right part of the Defendant’s chest, and walked the Defendant’s febbbbbbbage, and walked the Defendant’s feat, and walked the Defendant’s fe.

As a result, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning G, H, J, K, L and M's 112 reported withdrawals and initial measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement against H, K, M, G, L, and J. 1.