beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Changwon District Court-2015-Na33223 (2016.07)
Title
(C) Since the sale of this case constitutes a fraudulent act, the defendant's sales contract should be revoked.
Summary
(C) The sales of this case constitutes a fraudulent act and thus the defendant's sales contract should be revoked.
Related statutes
Article 30 of the National Tax Collection Act: Revocation and Restoration of Fraudulent Act
Cases
Supreme Court Decision 2016Da220020 Revocation of Fraudulent Act
Plaintiff-Appellee
Korea
Defendant-Appellant
tanks 00
Judgment of the lower court
Changwon District Court Decision 2015Na33223 Decided April 7, 2016
Imposition of Judgment
July 22, 2016
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.
Reasons
Examining the judgment below and the grounds of appeal, since it is apparent that the appellant’s ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.