logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 08. 19. 선고 2015다219009 판결
(심리불속행)채무초과 상태에서 유일한 부동산을 아버지에게 매매한 행위는 사해행위에 해당함.[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan District Court 2014Na41480 ( May 14, 2015)

Title

(C) If the sole real estate has been sold to his father in excess of his debt, it constitutes a fraudulent act.

Summary

(C) Unless there are special circumstances, it is reasonable to conclude a sales contract for the sole real estate to his father with the burden of national tax liability of the higher amount constitutes a fraudulent act in relation to the general creditors including the taxation creditors, and thus, it is presumed that the debtor and the beneficiary have been maliciously presumed.

Related statutes

Article 30 of the National Tax Collection Act Revocation

Cases

2015Da219009 Revocation of Fraudulent Act

Plaintiff-Appellee

Korea

Defendant-Appellant

Park AA

Judgment of the lower court

Busan District Court Decision 2014Na41480 Decided May 14, 2015

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant is clear that it falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and thus, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per

arrow