1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 5,000,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person operating a child-care center in Seo-gu, Daejeon, D apartment 111-dong 103 from March 2, 2012 to March 2, 2012.

No person shall receive subsidies under the Infant Care Act or have the State or local governments receive childcare expenses for infants by fraud or other improper means.

On March 2012, the Defendant, using a computer located at the above E-child care center, registered a child F as the child care center student by accessing the “child care integration system” managed by the Ministry of Health and Welfare via the Internet, and confirmed that F was present at the above child care center for at least 11 days and received childcare, and claimed KRW 361,00 as the child care fee for the above F, and requested F F F’s mother G to pay the child care fee of KRW 272,760 by requesting the said G to pay the child care fee of KRW 272,760.

However, although the above F is registered as a child care center, there was no fact that the F was present at the above child care center for at least 11 days.

Nevertheless, the Defendant filed a false claim for basic childcare fees, etc. as above, and transferred KRW 361,00 from Daejeon Metropolitan City to the national bank account in the name of the above child care center managed by the Defendant as the basic childcare fees around that time, and received the same amount as the national bank account by having the above G receive KRW 272,760 as the childcare subsidies.

The Defendant, including that, from March 12, 2012 to February 28, 2013, with respect to seven infants, including the above F, as described in the attached list of crimes, is KRW 11,297,00 in the indictment of KRW 11,397,00 in total of the basic childcare fees from the victim in the same manner, but it is obvious that the sum of the amount in the attached list of crimes is KRW 11,297,00 if the sum of the amount in the attached list of crimes is added, it is obvious that the Defendant is a clerical error of KRW

(2) the Corporation.