logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2012. 09. 27. 선고 2012누9446 판결
조세회피목적의 명의신탁에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Suwon District Court 201Guhap1512 (02.01)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 2010 Heavy0363 ( November 02, 2010)

Title

title trust for the purpose of tax avoidance

Summary

(As in the judgment of the court of first instance), regardless of the payment of the purchase price, a contract for stock transfer and concession that allows the plaintiff to exercise the preferential right to purchase with respect to the plaintiff is prepared, and the plaintiff is not a shareholder who exercises the right to the shares of this case, and thus constitutes a title trust for the purpose of tax avoidance.

Cases

2012Nu946 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff and appellant

SAA

Defendant, Appellant

Head of Central Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Suwon District Court Decision 201Guhap1512 Decided February 1, 2012

Conclusion of Pleadings

September 20, 2012

Imposition of Judgment

September 27, 2012

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. Of the appeal costs, the part arising between the Plaintiff and the Defendant is assessed against the Intervenor, respectively.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant shall revoke the disposition of imposition of gift tax of KRW 000 against the plaintiff on October 1, 2009.

Reasons

The reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are reasonable, and they are quoted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed for lack of reason

arrow