logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.06.21 2017고정816
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 23, 2016, the Defendant, at the E Office located in Pyeongtaek-si D Co., Ltd., Ltd. around September 23, 2016, made it possible to prepare the Victim F (F, 35 years of age) and the waiver of the construction, and assaulted the Victim with his arms to move out of the above office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of a defendant in part in the protocol of second public trial;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing sound recording CDs and recording records;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order asserts that there is no fact that the defendant had sold the victim. However, the victim consistently made a statement to the investigative agency and this court up to the point of view that "the defendant's own arms are left down and left in order to prevent the victim from leaving out," and the defendant also at the police police did not have to put the victim up and conclude the talk from the point of view because the victim did not escape without the word of Hanmadi, and it was inevitable that the victim put in his arms.

The statement “(54 pages of the investigation record). The recorded CD containing the conversation between the Defendant and the victim, etc. at the time of the instant case, where the Defendant continued to “ wherever he or she or anywhere” while preventing the victim who wants to leave the part of the Defendant, and the victim’s name and the victim’s name are unfolded, and during the instant case, the Defendant “I am Y and I am Y.

A. Do and liquor tax are required to be imposed on a person who passes around, on the one hand, "Do and liquor tax is required to be imposed on him."

In full view of the circumstances, including the fact that the content of the request for assistance is contained, the above assertion is sufficient to recognize the fact that the defendant has taken the arms of the victim.

arrow