Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The criminal facts were partly revised according to the facts acknowledged within the extent that does not actually disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her defense right.

On October 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 16:10 on October 30, 2016, the victim D (n, 39 years of age) who neglected himself/herself and took a part in his/her speech without a watch within the dwelling area of 1806, Busan, Busan, Busan, about 210-dong C210-dong 1806, and (b) at the same time, the Defendant took a part in his/her room of his/her talking that he/she would be able to say that he/she would be able to take part in food and drink and that he/she continued to take part in his/her arms by reporting it to the police.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury in need of approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment, such as the instant stuff and the instant stuffing room, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police investigation reports (investigation into attachment of photographs, submission of a written diagnosis of injury, and correction of name of the crime caused by violence);

1. Article 262 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Articles 262 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is arguing that the Defendant and the defense counsel did not have the intent of assault at the time of committing the instant crime, and it is difficult to regard the victim’s injury as being injured, and there was no probability for the injury to be injured. The Defendant asserted that the Defendant’s arms were cut down by the victim to prevent the victim’s act

Defendant

In addition, the defense counsel asserts that the defendant was not guilty of assault because he did not have any fact that he had a maternal contact with the victim. However, the facts charged in this case are as follows: "the defendant suffered injury that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment for the victim by cutting the victim's arms," and the defendant towards the victim.