Defendant

The sentence of sentence against A shall be suspended.

Defendant

B and C are not guilty.

Punishment of the crime

B On October 9, 2015, around 15:15 on October 9, 2015, the new father H (the father and the married father) of the marriage ceremony H is composed of the G church of the Daejeon Seo-gu F, Daejeon, and the defendant A is the deceased-child relationship of the above marriage ceremony I, and C is the mother of the defendant A.

The above marriage-based marriage-based marriage-based marriage-based marriage-based marriage-based B and C, Defendant A and Defendant A were gathered in the above church parking lot in order to complete the marriage-based marriage and conduct personnel affairs, and to hedge.

At this time, the victimsJ with the G church pastors and appraisal has assaulted by the G church pastors.

As the word, “,” etc., was large, and was carried out as the food hall of the G church with marriage awareness as above in order to spread the pastor of the G church.

Defendant

A on October 9, 2015, around 15:15, at G church of the Daejeon Seodong-gu F, Daejeon, around 15:15, in the process of speaking for a franc with the victim and K, used the victim's arms to be cut down on the upper floor, and used them to assault the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Recording part of the statement made by the witnessJ among the third public trial records;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on black boxes and video CDs;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Penalty fine of 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion of Defendant A and defense counsel under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., circumstances leading to the instant case)

1. The defendant A did not assault the victimJ.

2. Determination

A. According to the images of the black booms video CDs, in full view of the following: (a) Defendant A appears to have taken the arms of J as described in this part of the facts charged; and (b) Defendant A did not have been fluored even after the victim exceeded the floor and left the site, it is determined that Defendant A assaulted the victim as described in this part of the facts charged.

B. Defendant A and the defense counsel’s assertion is rejected.

The acquittal portion

1. Defendant B, C

A. Defendant B of the facts charged on October 15, 2015