logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.02.13 2017구단79076
토지수용보상금증액
Text

1. The defendant's KRW 15,028,930 for each of the plaintiffs and 5% per annum from December 17, 2016 to February 13, 2019.

Reasons

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public announcement - Project name: C Housing redevelopment and rearrangement project - Project implementer: Defendant - Project approval: D public announcement of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on October 30, 2014;

B. Decision of expropriation made on October 28, 2016 by the local Land Tribunal of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City on expropriation - The object of expropriation: F large 211.9 square meters (hereinafter “instant building”) in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E-dong (hereinafter “Edong”) and five floors and housing buildings on its ground (hereinafter “instant building”; hereinafter “instant building”); 1/2 shares in the instant building site; 334.08/668.15 shares in each of the instant building; 3334.08/668.15 shares in each of the instant building): The Plaintiffs’ compensation for expropriation: 619,628,160 won (i.e., 410,026,50 won shares in the instant building site: 209,601,600 won - the date of expropriation: the date of expropriation by the appraisal and assessment committee of December 16, 2016 - the date of expropriation (hereinafter “appraisal appraisal and assessment resolution”).

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on the objection on November 23, 2017 - The Plaintiffs’ compensation for losses (i.e., KRW 26,880,430, each of the instant building shares 417,278,770 (i.e., the instant building shares 417,278,770) (i., the instant building shares 209,601,660) was destroyed and did not separately evaluate the instant building in the appraisal for the purpose of the said ruling. The instant ruling on the objection on the share of the instant building is the same as the compensation for losses as the expropriation ruling on the compensation for expropriation) - The appraisal corporation I and the appraisal and assessment company JA (hereinafter referred to as the “appraisal”)

D. The court appraiser K’s appraisal result (hereinafter the above appraiser’s appraiser’s “court appraiser,” and the above appraiser’s appraisal “court appraisal”) selected Land 211.9 square meters for the instant site as a comparative standard for the instant site, and then, the time revision (it is from January 1, 2015 to October 28, 2016, the basic date of the officially announced land price of the non-standard land) is made.

arrow