A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 2337"

1. On February 26, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (drawing driving) on the road: (i) around 11:30 on February 26, 2017, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.069% during blood without a driver’s license, driven a Clearning car at approximately 100 meters from a main station near the E hotel in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu to the same front road.

2. On February 26, 2017, the Defendant: (a) while driving a private document as described in the preceding paragraph on the road in front of the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, the Defendant was subject to drinking control from a slope H affiliated to the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Police Station G G of the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Police Station; (b) stated “I” in each signature column of the situation statement, vehicle operation statement, and vehicle operation statement without authority for the purpose of exercising as the Defendant’s birth, and submitted the forged documents to H as if they were genuinely established.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant, without authority, forged and exercised the part of the driver's statement in the name of I, which is a private document to prove the fact of the driver's circumstantial statement, and the vehicle operation statement.

3. The Defendant forged a private signature and signed the above investigation at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, and operated as the Defendant’s birth at the place, and caused a private portable device (PDA) (PDA) to input I’s personal information and the violation of the regulations on driving of drinking after measuring drinking. After that, H requested H to sign on the line for confirmation of the driver on the screen as a result of the fact of regulating the driving of the above portable device, H voluntarily signed the electronic signature on “I”, “I,” and sent H H who knew of the above writing to the traffic police network as if the file was prepared genuinely as a result of regulating the driving of the vehicle.

The defendant is therefore entitled to exercise.