logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.02.22 2017고단3265
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around February 28, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury), the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) led the Defendant to drive D E business vehicles with alcohol concentration of 0.119% in the blood while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license on February 28, 2017, and drive D business vehicles at a speed of 0.119% in the blood level on the right side of the foreline, one way prior to the F police box in Gwangju City E in the direction of Gwangju City.

At night, in such a case, the driver had a duty of care to safely drive the steering boat and the steering system by accurately manipulating the steering boat and the steering system.

Nevertheless, as it is neglected to do so, it was placed in the front part of the above vehicle, and it was received a street village sign stone installed in the front part of the above vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered approximately 4 weeks of medical treatment from the victim G (37 tax) who was accompanied by the foregoing occupational negligence, to the right side of the said vehicle.

2. On February 28, 2017, at around 02:47, the Defendant: (a) expressed the name and resident registration number (J) of I, who was asked the head of the Gyeonggi Police Station, who was in charge of the foregoing traffic accident at the F Police Station located in Gwangju City, to ask questions concerning personal matters by the police officer H at the police box located in Gwangju City, who was in charge of the foregoing traffic accident.

Accordingly, the above H entered the above I's personal information in the notification of the result of the drinking driving control using a mobile device, and the Defendant signed the I's signature in the notification column of the results of the above drinking driving control and delivered it to the above H.

Defendant continued to enter the above I’s personal information, the date and place of detection, the result of measurement, etc., as stated in the “I” in the driver’s name column of the main driver’s circumstantial report prepared by the above H, and then delivered I’s signature to the above H.

Accordingly, the defendant forged I's signature for the purpose of exercising, and used forged signature.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow