A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On July 22, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) from the Busan District Court’s branch branch. On November 17, 2015, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) at the Busan District Court’s Busan District Court.

[Criminal facts]

1. On July 31, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by around 03:5 on the road traffic law (drinking driving) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (dimplicing driving) on July 31, 2016, the Defendant driven a frodi vehicle from about 1km to the front road of the “E” located in the Gu, Chang-gu, Chang-si, Gowon-dong, Gowon-si, Gowon-si, Gowon-si, Gowon-si, Gowon-si, Gowon-si, who was under the influence of alcohol by 0.10%.

As a result, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice, and once again drives a motor vehicle without a driver's license in violation of the above provision.

2. On July 31, 2016, the Defendant issued the Defendant’s name and resident registration number on the Defendant’s letter-keeping of the police station G police station G police station in Jindo, Jindo, Jindo, Jindo, Jindo, on the front of “E” located in Jindo, Jindo, Jindo, Jindo, who was under his control and was required to verify the identity for the same reason as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, following the Defendant’s name and resident registration number.

Accordingly, the above H, using a portable information device (PDA), prepared a notice of the results of drinking driving control and demanded the Defendant to sign the confirmation. The Defendant signed the above notice as “I” in the signature column of the driver confirmation part in the above notice, and let the above H transmit it through the police internal computer network.

Accordingly, the defendant forged his signature in the name of I for the purpose of exercising his right, and exercised it.

3. When the Defendant, at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph 2, was required to prepare a part of the driver’s circumstantial report confirming the driver’s identity of the Plaintiff at the time and place, the Defendant was required to do so.