1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The following facts of the facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by taking into account the whole purport of the pleadings in the descriptions of evidence No. 9 (Evidence No. 43-1 of the A), evidence No. 12, evidence No. 22-24, evidence No. 44, evidence No. 51, evidence No. 52, evidence No. 52, evidence No. 1 of the A, and evidence No. 2.

In relation to the Diplomatic Association of Korea, the Diplomatic Association of Korea (hereinafter referred to as the "Yyeongyang-gu Association") shall be established under the Diplomatic Association of Korea (hereinafter referred to as the "Yyang-gu Association of Korea").

(2) On August 201, 201, the Korean War Veterans Association, which is a affiliated church, has been engaged in the activities of the AR pastor from around 2005, but there was a dispute by dividing the church believers into the so-called “AS” which is a group supporting the AR pastor and the so-called “H (voluntary gathering of D”) which is an opposite party to the AR pastor. (2) The Korean War Veterans Association of Korea decided that the AR pastor’s resolution is null and void, and accordingly, the Egym Union passed a resolution to send AT pastor to the temporary chairperson of the D church on the ground of the vacancy of the chairman of the party church.

On November 23, 2011, when the so-called “AU” to support a pastor from the beginning of the appointment as a member of the AT pastor and the new affiliates affiliated with “H” were punished for mash and accusation, and Diplomatics filed against the Ethical Council and the AT pastor on the lawsuit to confirm the invalidity of the resolution of the temporary president of the party branch (Seoul Central District Court 201Gahap83665) filed against the Ethical Council and the AT pastors, the AT pastors resigned from office on February 2012 continued to continue to have the status of the D church’s member as a member of the D church.

3) On June 25, 2012, in the course of that resolution, the Pyeongtaek Labor Association passed a resolution to send the plaintiff supported by the believers belonging to the "AU" to the temporary chairperson of the D church. The plaintiff was appointed to the temporary chairperson of the D church, and the new believers belonging to the "H" were caused by the said resolution. On the other hand, the plaintiff was a member of the C church, which was the member of the C church, and the Seoul East-dong Labor Association, to which the C church belongs, opposed the plaintiff to the temporary chairperson of the D church, and accordingly, on July 24, 2012.