1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Defendant B, which exceeds the money ordered to be paid below, shall be revoked.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Diplomatic Association, a church affiliated with the E Religious OrganizationF under the E Religious Organization Assembly, has been engaged in the activities of the Diplomatic Association at around 2005. However, the Diplomatic Association, a church believers supported G pastors, divided into so-called “H” and so-called “I (ENN)”, an opposite to that of the church believerss. The Defendants were “I” and, in particular, Defendant B, a collector of the said church, filed a criminal complaint for fraud and embezzlement, and filed a lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of the D Religious Association’s ice resolution to the E Religious Organization’s Assembly on June 201, on the ground that the D Religious Organization’s resolution on August 2, 201 was null and void, and the E Religious Organization’s temporary resolution was adopted to the effect that the E Religious Organization’s resolution on July 2, 2011 was invalid.

J From the beginning of the appointment of a wood company to the so-called "Maintenance Team" affiliated with the said wood company and the new Dos affiliated with the Defendants, etc. I, including the Defendants, were punished for a mash and accusation, and in the lawsuit to confirm the invalidity of the resolution of the strike of the temporary president of the party branch (Seoul Central District Court 201Gahap83665) brought by the Diplomatic Association against the J wood company, and on February 2012, Diplomatic Association continued to continue to have the status of a co-ordinant.

3) On June 25, 2012, E religious organizationF passed a resolution to send the Plaintiff, supported by the believers affiliated with the “Maintenance Team,” to the temporary president of the Diplomatic Association. According to the above resolution, when the Plaintiff was left to the membership pastor of the D church, the believers affiliated with the Defendants et al., and the Defendants et al., went against this resolution. B. Defendant C’s assault 1) Defendant C and the “I,” and K, K and L, affiliated with the “I,” around 10:00, around June 25, 2012, the Plaintiff’s chest and shoulder were salved, and the Plaintiff’s chest and shoulder were salved by drinking together with the Defendant C et al.