1. The Plaintiff, Defendant B, as well as Defendant B’s KRW 10,563,780 from August 10, 2012; Defendant C, as Defendant C, as well as KRW 2,066,80.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged in full view of the whole purport of the pleading in the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 3, 5, 8 to 19, 21, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 4 and 7:

The dispute surrounding the Diplomatic Association (1) was divided into so-called "H" and so-called "I (voluntary gathering of Diplomatic Association)" which are opposite to the church believerss, which are the E religious organization F under the E Religious Organization General Assembly in around 2005. However, the Diplomatic Association, which was the E religious organization F of the E Religious Organization, had been seeed as the chairman of the D Religious Association in around 2005.

The Defendants were the believers belonging to the above “I” and, in particular, Defendant B, a collector of the above church, filed a criminal complaint for the crime of fraud and embezzlement of G pastor around June 201, and filed a lawsuit with the E Religious Organization General Assembly seeking confirmation of nullity of the resolution of request for G pastors.

(2) On August 201, 201, the Assembly of Religious Organizations rendered a ruling to the effect that the resolution of the Council members of G pastors is null and void, and accordingly, the members of E religious Organizations F, on the ground that the vacancy of the Council members, made a resolution to send the Council members to the temporary council members of the D church.

J He was sentenced to the so-called "Maintenance Team" affiliated to the so-called "Maintenance Team" which supports the above pastors from the beginning of the beginning of the appointment and the new islands belonging to "I" such as the Defendants, and sentenced to the judgment of the losing party in the lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of the resolution of the strike of the temporary chairman of the party branch (Seoul Central District Court 201Gahap83665) which was filed by D Diplomatic Association, and Diplomatic Association resigned on February 2012 and continued to continue to have the state of tin.

(3) On June 25, 2012, E religious organizationF passed a resolution to send the Plaintiff, supported by the believers affiliated with the “Maintenance Team,” to the temporary president of the Diplomatic Association. In accordance with the above resolution, the Plaintiff was appointed as a member of the D church. As the Defendants et al., “I” affiliated with the Defendants et al., were in conflict with the resolution.

B. On June 25, 2012, the Defendants’ tort (1) belongs to Defendant C and I.