logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1983. 10. 25. 선고 83다515 판결
[손해배상][집31(5)민,69;공1983.12.15.(718),1742]
Main Issues

Whether or not there exists a benefit from appeal by a person who won the appeal (negative)

Summary of Judgment

An appeal may be filed only for a judgment unfavorable to an appellant, and whether the judgment is disadvantageous to appellant shall be determined as at the time of the filing of the appeal in accordance with the main text of the judgment. Therefore, the plaintiff who has received the judgment in the first instance judgment shall not have any benefit in filing an appeal.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 360(1) of the Civil Procedure Act

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Decision 73Da565 Delivered on September 25, 1973

Plaintiff-Appellant

Plaintiff

Defendant-Appellee

Defendant

Judgment of the lower court

Daegu High Court Decision 82Na1751 delivered on July 13, 1983

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiff.

Reasons

We examine the Plaintiff’s ground of appeal.

The gist of the grounds of appeal is that the appellate court has a benefit to file an appeal in order to expand the purport of the appeal until the closing of argument in the appellate court, even the plaintiff who was judged in favor of all of the first instance court because the appellate court falls under the immediate appellate court, and thus, the appellate court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal, unlike the opinion of the court below, has committed an unlawful interpretation as to

However, an appeal can only be filed against a judgment disadvantageous to himself, and the decision unfavorable to an appellant shall be determined at the time of the filing of the appeal on the basis of the text of the judgment (see Supreme Court Decision 73Da565 delivered on September 25, 1973). Therefore, there is no error in the judgment of the court below that the plaintiff who received the judgment in favor of the whole court in the first instance did not have any interest in the appeal, and the ground for appellant's assertion does not fall under any of the subparagraphs of Article 11(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, and therefore,

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Yoon Il-young (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-대구고등법원 1983.7.13선고 82나1751