logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.10.19 2016고단6631
위증
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 14, 2016, around 16:00, the Defendant appeared as a witness of a case of violation of the Act on Entrusted Elections against the Daegu District Court No. 201, the Daegu District Court of Law No. 201, which was located in 2 Dong-gu, Daegu Suwon District Court of Law No. 201, 2016.

The Defendant, “A witness, on March 5, 2015, drafted directly the instant text message under the title “Ch. 5 p.m. Kim Jong-cheon Articles” and sent it to its members.

“To answer the questions of the defense counsel”.

The witness testified as “,” and the witness found the G Articles and H in a specific way, the content of the instant text message.

The questions of the counsel called “I have mainly used the NAV search windows, but I have different contents from the NAV to the Kim Kim Do-sung.”

The testimony, “Is the title of the text message,” and what is the reason why the letter “Is the title of the message is affixed in this 8 letter to the Nonghyup-Related Articles Kimcheon.”

“The questions of the defense counsel “ shall be written in the meaning of an article related to the agricultural products in his/her match Kim.” It must be written in one column in Kim Jong-cheon and as the agricultural products related to the agricultural industry, and the proposal has been in place.

The witness gives testimony to the witness, and whether the witness, after preparing the text message of this case, sent to the defendant in advance or received confirmation from the defendant of the contents or title of this case before sending them to its members.

“I will not answer the question of the defense counsel.”

The time from which the telephone was received was much more than 3 times, and it was not immediately drawn up by the recipient, but was drawn up by another day, and sent to 5:0 p.m., it was sent.

There was no time to confirm, and it did not have any idea that it is necessary to confirm because the contents of the newspaper were extracted as they were.

“The testimony was made.”

Then, on October 26, 2016, the Defendant is the Daegu District Court (Seoul District Court) around 10:30.

arrow