Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of 4 million won.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, KRW 100,000.

Ⅰ On January 9, 2015, the Defendant B (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant B”) was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a period of three years at the Ulsan District Court for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the same day.

around 15:30 on June 19, 2014, the Defendant appeared at the court of Ulsan District Court No. 102 in Ulsan District Court No. 45 on July 19, 2014, 2014, 892, 1168, 2014, 1168, 2014, 1168, 200, 2000, 2000, 2000, and 300,000,0000,000

The Defendant knew at any time that he was responsible for Defendant E’s withdrawal.

He had different knowledge that he is responsible for withdrawal” in the question referred to as “.”

“At the prosecutor’s investigation or investigation agency, the prosecutor’s “the witness was asked to introduce a person who is to withdraw the witness test from the prosecutor’s office.”

If so, it is required that the statement in the investigative agency was wrong.

I would like to ask whether “I would like to answer the circumstances when I would make an investigation that I would like to read several times.”

at the risk of withdrawal.

If “I see that” is “I see that I see it in light of the circumstances.”

I have the honor to answer.

“The testimony was made, and the prosecutor’s “as soon as the circumstances fit and, at that time, that time, it was certain that the prosecutor respondeded thereto.”

It is required to see whether the answer is not an answer.

It is necessary to give testimony to the question "..." and whether the prosecutor "at that time is a witness who is actually responsible for the withdrawal."

In the case of “To make a withdrawal, I would like to know how you talk and make a telephone, in other words, because at that time, they are doing construction on the side of another office at that time, and the sound was too high.

"At the time of the prosecutor's testimony", the prosecutor's "no witness has received any money directly from E", and the prosecutor's "no person has received any money from E".

The testimony called “...” was made to the question “....”.

The defense counsel continues to be “A” at the police.