The punishment of the accused shall be determined by six months of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 19, 2017, around 14:00, the Defendant testified after attending the court of Gwangju District Court 102, which was located in Gwangju Dong-gu, 7-12, as a witness for the violation of the Food Sanitation Act against the above court of 2016 High Order 5458, 2016 High Court Order 5458.

The Defendant’s witness “C” need to go back to the “C” public prosecutor’s “C” danran bar.

He/she goes to go to the Gu by stating that he/she will go to the Gu if he/she is a daily allowance if he/she is a job.

It is necessary for the prosecutor to give testimony as ", however, according to beer and to receive the same as the customer preserving table, and to sing and singing."

The question "" was received as a daily allowance, and at that time the customer would bring about drinking to him/her, and would do so.

The testimony "," and the prosecutor's "the witness" does not want to enter the room of "C" ran tavern on the condition that the defendant receives KRW 50,000 won per day with the defendant and provide customers with alcohol, and to encourage them to enjoy entertainment while playing together with customers.

G. G. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.W.

“At the time of the public prosecutor’s testimony, the public prosecutor’s “the witness was to receive a daily allowance from an investigative agency and to provide the customer with the same alcohol.”

Preparation Doz.

“The first day of question” has been written in letter.

The testimony to the effect that it is “,” and the defense counsel’s “whether or not the defendant did not have any work, and as a result, the witness has acted in favor of him.”

The term “Ismi” is not “Ismi” to the question.

It is only a string that the customer can sit because he or she cannot sit, and the proposal has been newly made on the main part.

Magres, I told that the customer will be able to be able to do so.

I am me with only one customer's license, and I am l'd' according to the future customer's license, and the customer who was l'd't l'd'd't l'd't l'd't l'd

shall be received.

“The testimony was made.”

However, the facts are shown by the Defendant in the “C” ran tavern operated on September 13, 2016.