beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, and for one year, each of the defendants B.
, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Justice] On April 8, 2011, Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for robbery, injury, etc. at the Chuncheon District Court on April 16, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 16, 201. However, on October 18, 2011, the said suspended sentence was revoked, and the execution of the said sentence was terminated at the Gangnam Prison on March 1, 2013. On November 10, 2011, Defendant B was sentenced to nine months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Rape, etc.) at the Gangnam Prison Branch Branch of the Chuncheon District Court on December 1, 2013.
[2014 Highest 365]
1. Defendant A
A. On April 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 11:20 Yung-si, the 1112 reported at the “Bad tree rest area” located in Gangnam-si, 2792, and arrested the Defendant’s first-hand G as a flagrant offender suspected of assault; (b) arrested the Defendant’s first-hand G as a flagrant offender; (c) sealed the chest part by hand to prevent the above slopeF from arresting the said G; and (d) assaulted the said slope F from carrying the said G into the patrol vehicle.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of police officers' 112 reported cases and the arrest of flagrant offenders.
B. On May 3, 2014, at around 17:59, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) the Defendant, who was working in the Gangnam Police Station E District of the Gangnam Police Station, and called the Defendant, to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the suspicion of assault; (b) the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, bread the Defendant’s body, fright the Defendant’s body; (c) Had the Defendant’s desire to stop the Defendant, and then Had the Defendant’s bit of bitch bitch bit of bitch bit of bitch bit of bitch bitch bitch.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of police officers' 112 reported cases and the arrest of flagrant offenders.
2. Defendant B A.