logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.11.27 2013고정1670
공무집행방해
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged was from around 18:0 on November 5, 2012 to 19:50 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) from around 18:00 on November 5, 2012 to around 19:40 on the D’s residence located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (No. 413 Dong 1205), the Defendant would be a winner if at least three points are at least three points by using 48 ports; and (b) at the same time, the Defendant called

The Defendant expressed, at the same date and time as described in paragraph (1), at the same place as described in paragraph (1), that he was dispatched to the site after receiving a report of 112, the Defendant expressed to F (the age 45) of the Seoul Gangseo-gu E District E District E District, that he was “doing to see what she would have been wrong for us because she was not a criminal offender,” and obstructed the legitimate performance of public duties concerning the prevention and suppression of police officers’ crimes, such as: (a) pushing the chest of the E District E District E District E District; (b) cutting the chest of the g (the age 40) where she continued to restrain him; and (c) cutting the fat of the g (the age 40) of the E District E District E District; and (d) assaulting him at once after putting him in body with his body, and assault him.

2. As evidence corresponding to the facts charged in the instant case, F and G police and statements in this court are made.

First of all, the statement at F and G police: “The Defendant, while taking a sudden interest and desire, f’s body was sealed by hand, and the back head part of the wall of the apartment is faced with. As a result, G was intended to restrain the Defendant, with the body of G being pushed off by using hand floor, drinking, etc., and harming G, with the intent of “The Defendant was pushed down, taken a bath, and broken down beyond the floor of the apartment.”

However, in this court, F tried to see the prosecutor's question " why the defendant was satisfy (or why he was satisfy)" that "in the process of confirming the identity of other gambling-related persons (the defendant) satisfying the lower test and satisfy the chest 1, and satisfy the chest, and the chest was satisfyd between them, and the defendant was forced to satisfy," or "the defendant was satisfyd by satisfying the defendant at 1 time, and satisfy on the side of the wall."

arrow