logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2012.10.09 2012고단455
공무집행방해등
Text

Of the facts charged in the instant case, each of the charges of obstruction of the performance of official duties is acquitted. As to the insult of each of the facts charged in the instant case.

Reasons

The acquittal portion

1. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant conspired with C on January 8, 2012, around 03:50, at the Jeju Dong Police Station E zone located in Jeju-si, Jeju-si, on the ground that the police officer conducted a biased investigation, the Defendant: (a) took a bath to F on the ground that the police officer conducted a biased investigation; and (b) C, in the next place, attempted to have a garbage cover “F,” “F,” which means “F,” and “F,” which means “F, is well flicked,” and was going to go back to F, and was going to go into his seat, and her seated to F, and the Defendant was sealed to arrest F and slope G as a flagrant offender; and (c) the Defendant obstructed F and F and F’s lawful arrest and interfered with the performance of duties by assaulting a flagrant offender with F and F.

2. Determination

A. The defendant asserts that the defendant only attempted to assault police officers by Dong C, who is a birthee, and that there was no assault by police officers as stated in the facts charged.

B. (1) Unlike the record of the facts charged that the Defendant abused G first, G statements in the police and this court that all of the Defendant did not have any such relation in relation to the Defendant’s assault, and the F statements to the effect that the Defendant was not tightly in this court, and there is no other evidence supporting the Defendant’s smuggling.

(2) Next, the initial police officer stated, “F interfered with the police officers who intend to arrest Defendant C as a flagrant offender, and during the process of arresting the Defendant as a flagrant offender, the Defendant was flabed by flabing the right hand hand of the Defendant with the hand hacks.” However, in this court, “the Defendant was flabed by flabing the witness to prevent the Defendant from arresting C, thereby directly putting the witness.”

arrow