logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.10.20 2016고단1214
모욕등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 18, 2015, the Defendant’s insultd the EPC located in Jeju-si, using the article that is “G” to the article that connects the Internet newspaper’s “diculous sound” on the Internet homepage, and is called “G” to the Do residents’ opposition to a commercial hospital at low conference. It does not bring profits to Jeju-do, but the Do residents’ objection to the commercial hospital. The head of the party, the head of the party, the party, and the head of the party, the Do, the Do, and the head of the party, the Do, the Do, in turn, do not want to do so, and there is only the logic of his own, and there is no opinion from his own.

2. Around 12:21 on January 10, 2016, the Defendant, who was in violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (defluence) provided that “L” was an off-lined article of “L” and “L” was known to all people who want to engage in any behavior that would not be taken by a public official while having access to the He Bureau or senior public official, while the elderly is coming up with the U.S. P., in the U.S. P., a woman, who is not a civil lawsuit by the head of the U.S., and who was in violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. (defluence).

The People's Republic of Korea is under litigation with the amount of 100 million won which is 10 million won.

The age and age of the elderly are the head of the Jeju-do MU, but the branch office is considered to be the basic morality of the senior public officials, and it seems that the branch office has to be subject to the intention of 0 times."

However, there was no fact that the victim H has committed a civil lawsuit against his father-math and the sub-math, or due to such fact, there was no fact that the victim H had filed a civil lawsuit against 100 million won.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public false information through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victim.

(i) the evidence;

arrow