beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from January 10, 2016 to November 22, 2016.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiff is in charge of the director-general, and the defendant was in charge of D's policy adviser at the time of the following criminal acts.
B. The Defendant, in the Jeju District Court case No. 2016 Godan1214, sentenced the Plaintiff to a suspended sentence of 2 months due to the offense of insult and the violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. (Defamation), was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 4 months, and was still pending
At the GPC bank located in the Eth City in Jeju, the Defendant, using the Internet newspaper "H" Internet homepage as an Do residents opposed to the K at low level, using the article "J" as an Do residents oppose the K. They do not bring profits to the Jeju-do Council, and the head of the party, the head of the party, even though he did not want to bring profits to the Do, and there is only a logic of his own, and there is no opinion of the people who do not want to do so from the Do."
Accordingly, the defendant openly insulting the plaintiff.
Around L 12:21, the Defendant used the article that “P” was connected to the above “H’s Internet homepage, and that “P” was known to the people who want to be aware of an act that is prohibited from a high-ranking public official. In addition, the aging and age of elderly women, who are currently prone to the U-Namn, and are now pro-Namn in the U-Namn city, do not have a financial communication with employees, who are the branch where a low-income woman is displayed as a female director-general. The U-Namn People’s Republic of Korea will be the director-general of the U-Namn city and 10 million won lawsuit. The low age and age of the Republic of Korea are the C, but for the Do residents who are deemed to be the basic morality of the public official, a branch office should be taken once in 00.”
However, the fact is that the plaintiff stops with the U.S. father or it is such.