beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who uses the “C” as an clinic of the Internet daily Vietnam storage (www.be.com).
On November 27, 2013, 2013, the deceased using the "D" was called "A" and the victim's father was written and posted by cutting down his/her twitter writing on the bulletin board of the Japanese repository for the political daily newspaper on November 27, 2013, and then the victim's father was written and posted. At around 17:25:54 on the same day, the defendant was sent back to the "C" at his/her own residence of the F apartment 102, 401, Namnam-si, Yangsan-si, Busan, to the "C", and the above writing was sent to the G, if he/she was affiliated with the G, for which he/she was unable to meet his/her self-defaat, the time of his/her residence was w (w.bebe.com/H) and openly insulting the victim.
B. On November 26, 2013, 2013, the non-satis who used the medical clinic "I" posted the victim's twitter writing and Twitter writing on the victim's twitter and J's twitter on the bulletin board of the Japanese Storage (W.be.com/K on November 26, 201), while posting the victim's twitter writing on the victim's twitter in one’s dwelling at around 15:54:11 of the same day, the Defendant published the victim's twitter writing on the victim's twitter in one's dwelling. (www.be.com/K) The Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by posting the comments.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Legal statement of witness E;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to file a complaint and accompanying documents;
1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.