beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Suwon District Court-2017-Gu Partnership-139 (Law No. 13, 2017)
Title
It cannot be viewed that the defect is obvious as it was based on the precedents before the Supreme Court's ruling was changed due to a disposition prior to the Supreme Court ruling.
Summary
It cannot be viewed that the defect is obvious as it was based on the precedents before the Supreme Court's ruling was changed due to a disposition prior to the Supreme Court ruling.
Related statutes
Article 21 of the Income Tax Act Miscellaneous Incomes
Cases
Seoul High Court 2017Nu57099
Plaintiff
Is 00
Defendant
000 director of the tax office
Conclusion of Pleadings
November 15, 2017
Imposition of Judgment
December 20, 2017
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance court is revoked. On May 8, 2014, the defendant confirmed that the imposition of global income tax of KRW 26,552,540 against the plaintiff for the year 2009 is null and void.
Reasons
The court's reasoning for this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation
Article 8 (2) of the Court Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be quoted as it is.
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.
It is so decided as per Disposition.