A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 27, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong site on December 27, 2007. On March 16, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of four million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Daejeon District Court’s Incheon District Court’s Support on March 16, 201.

1. On March 24, 2012, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.087% without a vehicle driver’s license on March 23:35, 2012, the Defendant driving a B-pon vehicle owned by the Defendant from around a 50-meter radius to the front road of the same company bank.

Accordingly, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act as a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act more than twice.

2. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated Bppon vehicles owned by the Defendant without purchasing mandatory insurance at the same time and place as the foregoing paragraph (1).

3. On March 24, 2012, around 23:40, the Defendant forged a private document and the uttering of a private document: (a) at the front of the Kimpo-dong Enterprise Bank, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, the traffic management supervisor at the Kimpo-si Police Station, concerns that the Defendant would be punished when driving under the influence of alcohol; (b) obtained a drinking measurement by deceiving the Defendant’s identity as if he was his personal information, and then obtained a drinking measurement by deceiving the Defendant’s identity as if he was his own personal information; (c) then written the “D” in the driver’s name column of the written report on the driver’s name of the driver of the driver’s vehicle; and (d) marked the name “D

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant is the driver of the master report in the name of D, which is a private document related to the certification of facts.