logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.06.04 2015고단508
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 19, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years by imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Incheon District Court on August 19, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 27, 2013, and is currently under suspended sentence. A person who was sentenced to a fine of two hundred and five hundred thousand won by a fine at the Incheon District Court on April 14, 2008 as a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

【Criminal Facts】

1. On February 2, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.126% without a vehicle driver’s license on February 2, 2015, the Defendant driving a DNA routing vehicle owned by the Defendant in a section of about 50 meters before the police box of the Sinpo-si Mapo-si Mapo-si, Kimpo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Kimpo-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act as a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act more than twice.

2. On February 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 23:15, the Defendant: (b) had concerns over the traffic control assistant E of the Kimpo-si Police Station in charge of the traffic control of the Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si; (c) had the Defendant’s f personal information under the influence of alcohol as if he were his personal information; and (d) had the driver confirmation column of the above E’s portable information terminal (PDA) driver confirmation column and the driver confirmation column of the driver’s circumstantial report written E.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising authority, has forged the F's signature without authority.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place as above 2, issued to the above slope E a portable information terminal (PDA) with the signature of the F forged as above, and delivered a report on the circumstances of the host driver as if they were duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial reports to the host driver;

arrow