logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.12 2017나34416
구상금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The quoted trial of the first instance court was examined closely by the parties’ allegations and the evidence presented at the first instance court and the first instance court, but it does not seem that there was any error in the fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court.

Therefore, the reasons for the decision of the court of first instance are as follows, except for the cases of using part of the decision of the court of first instance as follows, and therefore, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The phrase “a copy of the register of the court of first instance” as of 9 pages 2 of the judgment of the court of second instance shall be deleted.

Part 2 of the judgment of the first instance court, the second 16th "In many cases, the same year" shall be applied to "the same year."

The third side of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be the "Plaintiff" in the third side of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the "Plaintiff" shall be formed in the "in

The 9th sentence of the first instance court's 4th sentence "the intentional illegal act of embezzlement" shall be applied to "the illegal act".

Part 4 of the 5th judgment of the first instance court shall be added to the "part" in the 5th judgment.

The 5th to 15th of the judgment of the first instance shall be followed as follows.

In a case where one of the several vicarious debtors jointly and severally liable liable liable for tort has paid one or more of them to obtain joint immunity and exercises the right of reimbursement against the other vicarious debtors according to the ratio of the apportionment, determination of the apportionment ratio shall take into account the external elements directly related to the accident or damage, including the degree of negligence corresponding to the degree of each vicarious debtor's duty of care in relation to the occurrence or expansion of tort and damage, as well as the external elements directly related to the accident or damage, such as the degree of contribution, etc., including the degree of negligence corresponding to the degree of each vicarious debtor's duty of care in relation to the occurrence or expansion thereof. Furthermore, in a case where a special internal legal relationship exists between the vicarious debtor and the quasi-joint debtor and the obligor

arrow