logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.25 2016나50657
소유권보존등기말소 청구
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the cases where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is reversed as follows. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Two pages of the written judgment of the first instance; and

1. The basic facts:

The following Notes shall be deleted in paragraph 1:

Second side of the judgment of the first instance;

1. The basic facts

In the paragraph, “Plaintiff’s lighting division H” shall be added to “H”.

No. 3 of the judgment of the first instance court, "No. 4 of the land (X)" shall be changed to "4 of the land (V)".

Land (Y) No. 3(5) of the judgment of the first instance court shall be changed to "5(W) land (W)".

On the fourth nine pages of the decision of the first instance court, "The plaintiff shall purchase" as "the defendant shall purchase".

The 5th written judgment of the first instance court was completely amended by Act No. 2292, Jul. 20, 1971). The 5th written judgment of the first instance court was "before it was wholly amended by Act No. 2292, Jan. 19, 1971."

The River Act, amended by Act No. 2292, Jul. 20, 1971, is amended by Act No. 2292, Jan. 19, 1971, is amended by Act No. 2292, Jan. 6, 1971.

The 5th sentence of the first instance court's decision "before the whole amendment by Act No. 5893 of Aug. 9, 1999" shall be applied to "before the amendment by Act No. 5893 of Feb. 8, 1999."

The title 12 of the 7th judgment of the first instance court shall be classified into "(a)", and the title 3 shall be classified into "(c)".

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed as they are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow