(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.26 2017나33260

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.26 2017나33260

손해배상(자)

Text

1. Upon the Plaintiff’s request expanded in the trial, the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Therefore, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420

2. Part 2, column 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) shall be written by cutting “C” into “D bus” (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

On the 2nd 16th 16th 1 of the judgment of the first instance court, the "vehicle" shall be replaced by the "vehicle".

On the third 8th of the first instance court ruling, the phrase “for this reason, it is difficult to recognize that the ruling was reasonable” has been changed to that premise.

Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be referred to "this Court" as "the first instance court".

The 4th written judgment of the first instance court shall consist of the following 11 pages:

“ ① From January 9, 2014 to July 12, 2017 (from January 12, 2014 to July 12, 2017, the period of hospitalization shall be from January 9, 2014 to December 7, 2016; from December 26, 2016 to April 28, 2017; from June 2, 2017 to July 8, 2017; from August 8, 2017 to October 2, 2017: 14 of the first instance judgment of 100 per cent.

The following contents shall be added between the five and six of the first instance judgment of "(B) 43,423,440 won (=the sum of the following (=1), 2), and 40 won)". (4) The portion additionally disbursed after the closing of argument in the first instance judgment of "12,94,630 won" was 9, 13, and 14 of the first instance judgment of "12,94,630 won".

The "Date of the closure of pleadings" in the 5th sentence of the first instance court shall be applied to the "date of the closure of pleadings" in the 10th sentence.

The 5th to 19th of the first instance judgment shall be followed by the following:

“The antiscopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics: KRW 1,827,237 (2,109,000) is required, and there is no evidence to acknowledge that the said expenses have been spent by the date of the closing of the arguments in the trial. Therefore, the instant accident is deemed to have been disbursed on December 1

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.08 2017나12607

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.08 2017나51534

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.26 2017나44840

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.22 2015나73141

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.24 2017나17466