1. The plaintiff N's action is dismissed.

2. The Defendant’s Schedule I to Plaintiffs A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, and M.

Approval and public announcement of project implementation such as the process of adjudication - Project implementation - Project implementation - Project implementation - Project implementation - Project implementation - Project implementation - Project implementation - Project implementation 71,970 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant improvement zone”): May 15, 2008 (Public Notification Qu in Nam-gu Busan Metropolitan City, May 21, 2008): June 21, 2012 (Adjudication on Expropriation on March 16, 2015 of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport publicly announced by the Nam-gu Busan Metropolitan City Regional Land Tribunal announced on March 22, 2012) - Expropriation commencement date: May 8, 2015 - Land and obstacles owned by the plaintiffs in the instant improvement zone: The National Land Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff, etc.”).

Land owned and obstacles, etc. - Compensation for losses by target of expropriation: The term "compensation" in the attached Table 1 shall be as specified in the relevant list.

The result of the appraisal commission by the head of the S appraiser office of this Court - Compensation for each object to be admitted: The "appraisal amount" in attached Table 1 shall be as specified in each relevant item.

On June 21, 2012, 48 persons, including T&C, filed a lawsuit against the defendant seeking confirmation of invalidity of the project implementation plan and cancellation of the management and disposal plan approved by the head of the Busan Metropolitan City Southern District Government on August 2, 2013 on the ground that the change of the project implementation plan approved by the defendant from the Nam-gu Busan Metropolitan Government on June 21, 2012 substantially changed the expenses of the association for the first project implementation plan, but the consent of at least 2/3 of the union members was not obtained.

In November 28, 2014, this court changed the project implementation period from the change of the project implementation plan to 8 years, and the change of the project cost stated in the change of the project implementation plan has no significant impact on the interests of union members, and the first project implementation plan has been absorptioned and terminated.