1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff A KRW 10,251,070, and 37,157,590 to the plaintiff Doese Industry Co., Ltd. and each of them.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: Business name: B housing redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as "project in this case"): Defendant - Business site: Defendant - Project site: Busan Southern-Gu C Workers (hereinafter referred to as "instant project zone") - Public notice of business implementation plan approval: D public notice of Busan Metropolitan City on August 22, 2012; E public notice of January 22, 2014; F public notice of September 23, 2015; and public notice of December 2, 2015.

(b) Results of each adjudication by the Busan Metropolitan City Land Expropriation Committee and the Central Land Expropriation Committee, the results of the commission of appraisal by appraiser H of this Court are as follows:

1) The adjudication of expropriation by the Regional Land Tribunal of Busan Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant expropriation adjudication”).

- The starting date of expropriation: Land listed in attached Table 1, which is owned by the plaintiffs in the project area of this case - An appraisal corporation: A flood appraisal corporation, a stock corporation and an appraisal appraisal corporation 2) the Central Land Expropriation Committee's objection (hereinafter referred to as the "adjudication of this case"): Land listed in attached Table 1, which is owned by the plaintiffs in the project area of this case - Compensation for losses by object of expropriation: The term "amount of adjudication" in attached Table 2, which is described in the corresponding Table.

- An appraisal corporation: A new appraisal corporation, Pacific appraisal corporation, Pacific appraisal corporation 3) as a result of a commission of appraisal to appraiser H by this court - The amount of compensation for each expropriation object: Attached Table 2: The amount of compensation for each expropriation object is as stated respectively. [The ground for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply).

each entry, the result of the commission of appraisal to appraiser H by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The appraisal of the land owned by the plaintiffs in the procedure of the plaintiffs' assertion acceptance ruling and the objection ruling was assessed differently from the current state of the comparative standard, and was assessed unfairly low. The plaintiffs are the appraiser of the court of this case.