1. The Defendant: (a) 20,343,530 won to Plaintiff A; (b) 2,897,10 won to Plaintiff B; (c) 14,802,50 won to Plaintiff C; and (d) 1,405.

Approval and public announcement of project implementation, such as the background of adjudication - Project implementation: H district housing redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as "maintenance project in this case") - Project operator: Defendant - Project implementation site: The first project implementation plan approval: April 5, 2012 (public announcement April 29, 2012): The change of the project implementation plan: the adjudication of expropriation on April 13, 2015 (public announcement of November 27, 2013): the commencement date of expropriation on June 5, 2015 - The Central Land Expropriation Committee, such as the land and obstacles owned by the plaintiffs within the rearrangement project in this case - the land and obstacles owned by the plaintiffs in this case - the relevant compensation for each of the annexed categories: The same shall apply to the relevant compensation for each of the annexed categories of the land subject to expropriation:

As a result of the commission of appraisal by the appraiser J on January 1, 2012, compensation for each expropriation object based on the official announcement of land on January 1, 2012: The "appraisal Amount ①" in the attached Table shall be as stated respectively.

- Compensation for losses for each subject of expropriation on the basis of the officially announced value on January 1, 2013: The term "appraisal Amount ②" in the attached Table shall be as described respectively.

4 parties, including K, filed a lawsuit against the defendant for the cancellation of a project implementation plan approved by the head of the Nam-gu Busan Metropolitan Government on April 5, 2012. On May 30, 2013, the court rendered a decision to cancel the project implementation plan on the ground that the increase in the project cost was a substantial change in the project cost at the time of authorization for the establishment of the association, and the 2/3 or more of the members of the association did not meet the quorum but did not meet the quorum and did not pass a resolution.

The defendant appealed against the above judgment of the court of first instance (the Busan High Court 2013Nu1881), and the defendant has continued to conduct an extraordinary general meeting on September 6, 2013.