1. The Defendant: 59,312,300 won to Plaintiff A; 85,250,970 won to Plaintiff B; 27,695,840 won to Plaintiff C; and 27,695,840 won to Plaintiff D.

Approval and public announcement of project implementation, such as the background of adjudication - H Housing redevelopment improvement project (hereinafter referred to as "maintenance project in this case") - Project implementer: The defendant - Project execution site - The first project implementation plan approval: April 5, 2012 (public announcement April 29, 2012): the approval of the project implementation plan: the approval of the project implementation plan: the adjudication of expropriation as of April 13, 2015 of the Busan Regional Land Tribunal of Busan Metropolitan City (public announcement of November 22, 2013): the date of expropriation: June 5, 2015 - The Central Land Expropriation Committee, such as the land and obstacles owned by the plaintiffs within the rearrangement project in this case - the land and obstacles owned by the plaintiffs in this case - the relevant compensation for each of the annexed categories: the same as the relevant compensation for each of the annexed categories:

As a result of the commission of appraisal by the head of the JE office of this Court on January 1, 2012 - Compensation for each object of expropriation on the basis of the officially announced land price: Attached Table “Appraisal Amount ①” shall be as stated respectively.

- Compensation for losses for each subject of expropriation on the basis of the officially announced value on January 1, 2013: The term "appraisal Amount ②" in the attached Table shall be as described respectively.

4 parties, including K, filed a lawsuit against the defendant for the cancellation of a project implementation plan approved by the head of the Nam-gu Busan Metropolitan Government on April 5, 2012. On May 30, 2013, the court rendered a decision to cancel the project implementation plan on the ground that the increase in the project cost was a substantial change in the project cost at the time of authorization for the establishment of the association, and the 2/3 or more of the members of the association did not meet the quorum but did not meet the quorum and did not pass a resolution.

The defendant appealed against the above judgment of the court of first instance (the Busan High Court 2013Nu1881), and the defendant has continued to conduct an extraordinary general meeting on September 6, 2013.