logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 10. 27. 선고 2017두51815 판결
(심리불속행) 기준경비율을 적용하여 추계 결정한 이 사건 처분은 적법함.[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-32786 (Law No. 15, 2017)

Title

(C) If the standard expense rate is applied, the disposition of this case is legitimate.

Summary

(The main point of the original trial) Any disposition that is determined by estimation due to lack of necessary books or lack of important parts is legitimate.

Related statutes

Article 94 (Scope of Transfer Income)

Cases

Supreme Court-2016-Du-58048 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff and appellant

AA

Defendant, Appellant

O Head of tax office

original adjudication determination

Seoul High Court Decision 2015Nu72940 Decided October 11, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the allegation in the grounds of appeal is recognized as without merit under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow