logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019. 10. 17. 선고 2019두45845 판결
(심리불속행) 대물변제 가액을 실제거래가액으로 인정할 수 없어 환산취득가액을 적용한 처분은 적법함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2018-Nu69143 ( June 21, 2019)

Title

(C) If the conversion acquisition value cannot be recognized as the actual transaction value, a disposition to apply the conversion acquisition value is legitimate.

Summary

(C) The Defendant’s disposition imposing capital gains tax on the instant real estate by applying the conversion value on the ground that the acquisition value of the instant real estate is unclear, such as without any security or interest on the instant high-amount loan, and there is no evidence that the Plaintiff received the high-amount cash as the materials for divorce, etc.

Related statutes

Article 97 (Calculation of Necessary Expenses in Transfer Income)

Cases

2019Du45845 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

○ Kim

Defendant-Appellee

AA Head of the Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2018Nu69143 Decided June 21, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

October 17, 2019

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow