beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant, from February 2, 2019 to August 2019, worked as the ledger of the victim D apartment management office in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and was in charge of supervising the management of the employees of the above apartment security service who sent by the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd.
1. On March 9, 2019, the Defendant: (a) on March 18, 2019, when a service employee E, who was on duty at the above D Apartment Management Office, submitted to the victim a false security inspection report stating that 49 employees had worked for a total number of 49 employees; (b) on March 1, 2019, the Defendant informed the victim of the false security inspection report; (c) on March 18, 2019, when the employees E and F were working for a total of 4 consecutive years; (d) by deceiving the victim as if there was no employee absent from office; and (d) by deceiving the victim by submitting to the victim; and (e) around April 18, 2019, the victim made the excessive payment of KRW 608,000 as the national bank account in the name of the National Bank in charge
2. On April 9, 2019, the Defendant, even though the service personnel G, working at the above D Apartment Management Office, submitted to the victim a false security inspection report stating that he/she had worked for a full number of 49 persons, following the commission of the service personnel G, H, I, J, J, L, M, M, N, P, Q, Q, and R, which was conducted once every 12 years on April 1, 2019, deceiving the victim by approving the cost inspection report prepared as if the absence of the absent employee and submitting it to the victim. On May 18, 2019, the Defendant got the victim to pay the victim an excessive amount of KRW 1,824,000 in the monthly salary corresponding to the above annual implementation to the national bank account in the name of the National Bank in the name of the Dispute Management Office.
3. The Defendant committed May 5, 2019: (a) around May 5, 2019, submitted to the victim a false security supervision report stating that a service employee S who was working at the said D Apartment Management Office had been employed by 49 employees; and (b) on May 1, 2019, the Defendant submitted a false security supervision report stating that he/she had worked 49 employees.