logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.07.17 2018고정659
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The act of forging or exercising a loan certificate on or around 2015;

A. The Defendant, at the “E cafeteria” of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on the date of 2015, entered the title “A4” in the “A4 paper with a black-type pen,” and under which he borrowed the amount of KRW 17173,000 per day in D in the year of 2010.

Interest shall be paid as soon as the end of each month is the date of conscience, and shall be promised to be subject to criminal punishment in the future.

After entering “FI, GJ, and HK” at will without permission of F(her husband), G(her husband), and H(her husband) and with a view to exercising rights and obligations, a copy of the loan certificate in the name of F, G, and H was forged for the purpose of exercising rights and obligations.

B. The Defendant: (a) issued a forged loan certificate to the above D, who was urged to repay the debt from the above D at the above date, at the same time, at the place; and (b) exercised it as if it were duly formed.

2. Forging and holding events on August 2015;

A. The Defendant at the foregoing “E cafeteria” on August 2015, 2015, the Defendant would be able to repay the amount even in the case of G and H with a test-type pen attached to A4.

“After entering “J L and KH M” under the supervision of “G and H” without the permission of G and H, one copy of each letter in the name of G and H, a private document relating to rights and obligations, was forged for the purpose of uttering.

B. The Defendant: (a) issued a forged letter to the above D, who was urged to repay the debt from the above D at the above date, at the same time, at the place; and (b) exercised it as if it were duly formed.

3. Forgery and events on August 13, 2015;

A. The Defendant, at around August 13, 2015, posted the “E cafeteria” on the paper A4 using a verification-type pen, and maintained that the Defendant failed to promise because the Defendant had no time to do so.

As much as the maximum amount of money is used, the liquor tax is required to be raised as the two Dohma and the Dohhhhhh are to be raised.

“After stating it........”

arrow