Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. On September 8, 2010, the Defendant entered the title “performance note” in the paper A4 as a verification color pen, and affixed a DNA seal that “The address 203 Dong-dong 1601, A, D, and the above two persons asserted that E is self even if they take over all household appliances of 203 Dong-si, Gyeonggi-do, 1601, 1601, 1601, 200,000 won, and if civil and criminal liability becomes difficult and the civil and criminal liability becomes difficult, A and D shall be deemed not to be responsible for giving up nine million won, and they shall be resolved by E and legal resolution.” On September 8, 2010, the Defendant stated “A and D” as “I, each letter, and affixed a seal carried in advance on the name D.

As a result, the Defendant forged a letter of performance, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, in the name of D for the purpose of uttering, and issued a forged letter of performance to F, which is aware of the forgery, in the H pension located in Taean-gun G on the same day, and exercised it as if it was a document duly formed.

B. On November 16, 2010, the Defendant entered the title “the tea card” in the A4 form with an official seal affixed on the paper, and affixed a D seal, stating “the cash of 28 million won, 10 million won, 20 million won cashier’s checks, 8 pages of cashier’s checks, 28 million won with I bid deposit, 30% with I bid deposit, 28 million won with the address, and 10% with the bank’s interest rate calculated as 10% with the bank’s interest.”

As a result, the Defendant forged a copy of a loan certificate in the name of D, which is a private document related to rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering, and at the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on the same day, issued a forged loan certificate to the public official in charge of registration in the name-free statement who is aware of the forgery as if it were a document duly formed.

2. The Defendant introduced F to the victim D, thereby inducing the victim to do so on September 10, 2010.