As a ground of re-appeal, the content of other written statements

The grounds for the reappeal shall be expressed by means of a direct entry in the reappeal or reappeal, and since other written entries cannot be invoked, the content stated in the reappeal cannot be viewed as a legitimate ground for reappeal.

Articles 413 and 397 of the Civil Procedure Act

Supreme Court Order 82Ma777 Dated February 22, 1982 Dated June 25, 1979

Appellant 1 and 2 others

Seoul Central District Court Order 86Ra572 dated December 29, 1986

All reappeals are dismissed.

The grounds of reappeal are examined.

The grounds for re-appeal shall be expressed in a manner that directly states in the re-appeal petition or the re-appeal petition and shall not be invoked in other written statements (see, e.g., Supreme Court Order 82Ma77, Feb. 22, 1982; Order 82Ma777, Jun. 25, 1979; Order 79Ma168, Jun. 25, 1979). The term "re-appeal" cannot be viewed as legitimate grounds for re-appeal, and the contents that the bid price is too low compared to the market price cannot be grounds for re-appeal because it does not fall under

Therefore, all reappeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.

Justices Lee B-soo (Presiding Justice)