Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
purport.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts written by the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
[Supplementary part] The third part of the judgment of the court of first instance "from May 21, 2013 to July 15, 2013" shall be subject to the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance "from May 8, 2013 to September 27, 2013."
Part 4 (f) of the judgment of the first instance court, Part 8 of the 10th sentence " September 7, 2013" shall be applied to each " September 27, 2013".
The 7th written judgment of the first instance court "means of transport, routes, means of transport, and routes" shall be used as "means of transport and routes".
Prior to the amendment by Ordinance of the Ministry of Strategy and Finance No. 475 on March 6, 2015, Article 3 and 4 of the former Enforcement Rule of the Customs Act
(A) The term “service” was amended by the former Enforcement Rule of the Customs Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Strategy and Finance No. 475, Mar. 6, 2015). The term “service” in the 9th sentence of the first instance judgment shall be read as “service date.” The term “service date” in the 11st sentence of the first instance judgment (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da11808, Sept. 10, 2009) shall be read as “Supreme Court Decision 2009Da11808, Sept. 10, 2009.”
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant is accepted within the scope of the above recognition and the remainder is dismissed as there is no ground. The judgment of the court of first instance is consistent with this conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.