logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.13 2016가합500806
손해배상(의)
Text

The Defendants jointly share KRW 34,701,272 with the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from May 18, 2011 to July 13, 2016.

Reasons

Basic Facts

Defendant C is a dentist who, up to June 29, 2012, operates the E dental clinic located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dental Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant dental clinic”). The Plaintiff is a patient, who was a doctor working at the Defendant dental clinic, undergoes a bad surgery, humke surgery, etc. from Defendant B, who was a doctor working at the Defendant dental clinic.

피고 병원에서의 상담 및 수술 경위 원고는 2011. 5. 11. 피고 치과의원에 내원하여 부정교합, 주걱턱 등의 교정을 목적으로 상담을 받은 후 피고 치과의원에서 근무하던 의사인 피고 B으로부터 양악수술을 받기로 결정하였다.

On May 12, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with Defendant dental clinic, and Defendant B performed a pre-operation test against the Plaintiff, including radiation shooting and CT test.

On May 18, 2011, Defendant B performed poppy surgery (SRO) on the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant surgery”) (hereinafter “instant surgery”) and Hoppy surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

After the instant surgery, the Plaintiff received correction after the surgery from June 17, 201 at Defendant dental clinic.

On September 2, 2011, the Plaintiff filed an appeal against the Defendant B for symptoms of low-net and sacrificing of this part with the Defendant dental clinic, and the Defendant B had to observe the progress while providing the Plaintiff with preserved treatment, such as hot-resistant treatment and sacrific administration by saves based on saves, since it may require a considerable period of time until the sense of sense is recovered after the surgery.

On November 2, 2011, the Plaintiff appealed to Defendant B, who was within the dental clinic of the Defendant, and the symptoms of senscence continue to exist. Accordingly, Defendant B maintained the preservation treatment of the Plaintiff, as seen earlier, by means of hot-resistant therapy and scopic administration, etc.

Around February 2012, Defendant B transferred the business of Defendant D dental clinic to G on June 29, 2012.

After that, the plaintiff on April 2013.

arrow