logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원서산지원 2016.11.11 2011가단7804
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 38,902,200 as well as 5% per annum from August 17, 201 to November 11, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Determination on the claim for damages related to dental treatment

A. (1) On December 29, 2008, the Plaintiff complained of continuously smelling at the right-hand side of the music on December 29, 2008 (No. 16, 17) and photographs of the Manoma at the dental clinic. The Plaintiff taken photographs of the Manoma at the dental clinic.

② On March 3, 2009, the Plaintiff complained of and filed a complaint with the 16th and 17th dental clinic at the “Dental clinic” located in Seocheon-si.

At the time of the Republic of Korea, there was no Plaintiff No. 12, and there was no 11 and No. 13, and there was no 14, and no 16, respectively, and no 1,22, and 23, respectively. The 46th Annex was a fluence, and there was no 47, respectively.

On the day of the clinic, the Plaintiff taken a photo of the marma at the dental clinic on the day of the clinic, and was diagnosed as follows: “The removal of the existing marma from 13 to 23, the re-rupture shall be covered by the 17th dental treatment, and the 16th marcing and 47 shall require marcation,” and received treatment on March 10, 2009, by removing the marcties of the marc in 17.”

The procedure of the medical examination and treatment at the dental clinic operated by the Defendant, ① After that, the Plaintiff was at the time when his residence was located on July 30, 2009, hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital” operated by the Defendant.

The photographs of the pianos were taken by the members of the Gu, and consulted on the renals file.

In the medical records of the defendant hospital in which the assistant nurse F of the defendant hospital was recorded, the following treatment plans are formulated on the day of the plaintiff's internal organ, and the plaintiff stated that the medical expenses were determined to be total of KRW 8,00,000 between the plaintiff and the plaintiff, and under which the signature was made in the name of the plaintiff.

(1) The number of 12, 22 and 22 fluorries, two fluorries, two 17.

arrow